YOU CAN WIN YOUR CASE EVEN IF YOU ARE GUILTY AS SIN
YOU don't want to go to JAIL to save your career/life... you are ready to BE COACHABLE...
YOU JUST HAVE TO WIN?
If You in need of help from SOMEONE WITH 100% SUCCESS RATE, THAT'S ME!
NEVER GIVE UP... I'M RIGHT BEHIND YOU
I may just be the most important KEY in your Case & Life?
Without a doubt, because once engaged, I can zealously:
- Help you get out of jail/prison (if locked up),
- Help you dismiss your case pretrial without taking a plea or probation or snitching,
- Help you reverse a guilty plea or sentence on appeal, and/or get you millions in monetary relief.
RE-LAX... YOU ARE NOT ALONE
Although interesting, I don't focus my strategies on guilt or innocence because the "guilt or innocence" argument(s) is actually irrelevant in effective criminal defense (What did I just say?).
In criminal defense, you don't have to prove anything, all you have to do is show reasonable doubt (and their case collapses like a house of cards).
That is why ¨I lay back" and work in the background as a Ghost, a "House of Cards Demolition Man", as your Devil's Advocate (you want to have the advantage of "tapping" into my brain, extensive real life experience and extraordinary abilities as well as having my "Killer Case Law" at your fingertips)
PLUS... "you have Dario Busch on SPEED-DIAL", facebook too.
I'm well versed in ALL THREE SIDES of the coin(s) which is exactly what you need.
100% SUCCESS RATE COUNTS?
- Success rate, even on wicked heavy duty Federal & State Cases, is 100%.
- Check PACER or the court records, you can't find a Federal or State case I lost?
- However, I am not "BAR Attorney" (thank god), I DO NOT give "legal advice" ?.
WHAT IS CONSIDERED SUCCESS?
- NOT going to prison nor Losing Property / Assets,
- NOT entering a plea of guilt nor on Probation nor Parole,
- NOT working with government / law enforcement agency.
FYI: What I do, Advocacy, does not constitute the practice of law or legal advice... (nope)
I do not re-present any-body, I do not give legal advice, I merely evaluate everything "with a super-human mind" (Matlock/Cochran style) and relate in and for the record what I would have done if I was in that specific position (anyone with a different finding of fact and conclusion of law is welcome to sue me and try to prevail in court).
(1) one that defends or maintains a cause or proposal
(2) one that supports or promotes the interests of another
(3) ie: a passionate advocate of civil and constitutional rights.
(1) One who argues against a cause or position, not as a committed opponent but simply for the sake of argument or to determine the validity of the cause or position.
(2) Roman Catholic Church. An official appointed to present arguments against a proposed canonization or beatification
(3) ie: someone that has the ability to see things from all perspectives, like me, Dario Busch (and I am on your side)?.
BUT WHAT ABOUT PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE?
"The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state", State Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239.
"The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT", Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925).
Wanna try suing me or anyone else for practicing law without a license?
MOST ¨BAR ATTORNEYS¨ DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THEY
ARE FACING SO BEWARE IN RETAINING A ¨BAR ATTORNEY¨
WHY DO YOU NEED A
JURIS JITSU MASTER?
BECAUSE JUSTICE IS NOT WHAT
YOU WERE TOLD IN SCHOOL
1.) Prosecutor may violate civil rights in initiating prosecution and presenting case. - United States Supreme Court in Imbler v. Pachtman 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
2.) Immunity extends to all activities closely associated with litigation or potential litigation. - Second Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Davis v. Grusemever, 996 F.2d 617 (1993)
3.) Prosecutor may knowingly use false testimony and suppress evidence. - United States Supreme Court in Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
4.) Prosecutor may file charges without any investigation. - Eighth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Myers v. Morris, 810 F.2d 1337 (1986)
5.) Prosecutor may file charges outside of his jurisdiction. - Eighth Circuit Federal Court of appeal in Myers v. Morris, 840 F.2d 1337 (1986)
6.) Prosecutor may knowingly offer perjured testimony. - Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Jones v. Shankland, 800 F.2d 1310 (1987)
7.) Prosecutor can suppress exculpatory evidence. (Exculpatory defined: Evidence showing one innocent) - Fifth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Henzel v. Gertstein, 608 F.2d 654 (1979)
8.) Prosecutors are immune from lawsuit for conspiring with judges to determine outcome of judicial proceedings. - Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 E.2d 1072 (1986)
9.) Prosecutor may knowingly file charges against innocent persons for a crime that never occurred. - Tenth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Norton v. Liddell, 620 F.2d 1375 (1980)
10.) “But indeed, no person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact (contract), but he is not a party to it, The States are a party to it…” (emphasis added). Per: Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438 (1854).
11.) “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” Per: Senate Document #43; SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 62 (Pg 9, Para 2) April 17, 1933.
12.) Article 1 section 8 of the US constitution gives congress the power “To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;“
13.) Law of Nations BOOK 4 SECTION § 12: How the sovereign may in a treaty dispose of what concerns individuals.The necessity of making peace authorizes the sovereign to dispose of the property of individuals; and the eminent domain gives him a right to do it (Book I. § 244). He may even, to a certain degree, dispose of their persons, by virtue of the power which he has over all his subjects. But as it is for the public advantage that he thus disposes of them, the state is bound to indemnify the citizens who are sufferers by the transaction. (Ibid.)
14.) Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18 gives congress the power ``To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof`` which means there is no such thing as an unconstitutional law because they can do whatever they want as long as they ¨deem it necessary¨.
15.) No constitutional right exists under the Ninth Amendment, or to any other provision of the Constitution of the United States, “…to trust the Federal Government and to rely on the integrity of its pronouncements.” MAPCO, Inc. v Carter (1978, Em Ct App) 573 F2d 1268, cert den 437 US 904, 57 L Ed 2d 1134, 98 S Ct 3090.
16) “The use of perjured testimony and the non-disclosure of exculpatory information are certainly entitled to absolute immunity. See Imbler, 424 U.S. at 431 n. 34, 96 S.Ct. at 995 n. 34.
I AM EXACTLY WHAT YOU NEED
DONT HIRE A ¨BAR ATTORNEY¨
Just ENGAGE ME and you will be forwarded to my personal private facebook account where we can text, audio, and even video chat so we can communicate and dismiss your case pretrial.
Give me your "1-2-3 CHRONOLOGY", event by event, one paragraph per event.
Sstart each paragraph with DATE & TIME, only 3 paragraphs (as well as your contact information).
I dramatically, absolutely and totally, increase your chances to help yourself get out of jail/prison, dismiss your case, and even reverse your guilty verdict on appeal if you've been sentenced already.
If you've been sentenced and I find flaws in their case, which I always do because I know exactly what I'm looking for and know the game better than any prosecutor, I can help you get ridiculously high monetary relief up to in the tens of millions or more, I can show you actual cases (case law I use) where the case was dismissed or reversed and relief was between $6,000,000 to $110,000,000+, NO BULL.
Make a Devil's Advocate Retainer/Engagement Donation of $5,000, make it worth my time to stop what I'm doing and pay full attention to your case today. You will be forwarded to me directly upon completing your donation.
Much Love... Peace...
REMEMBER: I WANT FACTS... I DON'T WANT COMPLAINTS OF WHATEVER... I WANT FACTS 🙂
NEED AN EXAMPLE OF A 1-2-3 CHRONOLOGY?
Name: Dario Busch
Affiliate Username: dariobusch
Case number: CR: 2012-1-2-3-420
Location: St. Louis County, Missouri, 63379, 9th District Federal Court.
Charges: Manufacturing and possession of controlled substance with intent to distribute.
Budget towards defense: $120,000
- MONDAY, APRIL 1ST 2012, 1:15 PM:
I was walking down the street on my bare two feet when officer flatfoot approached me and demanded ID. I asked officer flatfoot why he was asking me for ID but he refused to answer and kept insisting I produce ID or I was going to be arrested for "failure to comply" so I said "under threat, duress, and coercion, I don't have a driver license or ID but my name is Dario Busch". Officer flatfoot immediately grabbed me, began to frisk me, and proceeded to handcuff me, took me to jail, and filed a report alleging that he found a meth lab and 4 pounds of methamphetamine in my back pocket (Bail was set at $250,000 which i could not afford and i stayed in jail until I was released OR after arraignment).
- WEDNESDAY, APRIL 29TH 2012 9:00 AM
I was taken from my cell to video arraignment with Judge Dick Sikkendick who entered a guilty plea on my behalf but without my consent and despite my objections (I was not ready to enter a plea, I didn't even have an attorney appointed to my case), but luckily (on my own motion) I was released OR and Filthy McNasty from Dowey, Chetam, & Howe was appointed as my counsel (public defender).
- FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21St 2012, 11:59 PM (Today)
Nothing has happened since I was released, status quo, ever time I try to communicate with my attorney, McNasty treats me like I don't matter and has done nothing at all for me or my case, I don't trust her at all. No motions have been filed properly. I have not even had a meaningful meeting with Mrs. McNasty. Everything that is happening seems to be in direct contradiction to everything i thought I knew about the just-ice system and violates everything resembling equal protection under the law. I am confused, angry, and disgusted (This is not America) but now I have trial coming up in 2 weeks and I don't know what to do.