The case law I mentioned

"Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but, in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.; "Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356, 370”.

“Proceedings in a court are legally void where there is an absence of jurisdiction.” Scott v. McNeal 154 US 34; Re: Bonner, 151 US 242.

Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a constitutional right from liability for they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v. Independence, 100 S. Ct. 1398.

The court is to protect against encroachment of constitutionally secured liberty.” Boyd v. U.S. (1886)116 U.S. 616.

“ANY act to deprive constitutionally protected rights is a direct violation of Oath of Office, a felony, and a federal crime”.

“ANY act to deprive constitutionally protected rights is a direct violation of Oath of Office, a felony, and a federal crime”.

The court is to protect against encroachment of constitutionally secured liberty.” Boyd v. U.S. (1886)116 U.S. 616.

“The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states” Article 4 section II of the U.S. Constitution, in its entirety.

“The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land and protected by the courts”.

“If you’ve relied on prior decisions of the Supreme Court you have a perfect defense for willfulness.” U.S. v. Bishop, 412 U.S. 346.

An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection’ it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425.

“Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them” Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 10 ALR 3rd 974 and 59 other ALR treatises.

“The exercise of a constitutional right cannot be the basis of a crime.” Marchetti v. US, 390 US 39, 57; See v Seattle 387 US 541.

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right can not be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional Rights.” Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

“The Fifth Amendment mandates that all judicial proceedings must proceed by due process. Since all judges take an Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution, and the Supreme Court has additionally held that government employees who violate any law in the performance of duties do not represent the government, should we conclude that adjudication that is not within constitutional requirements nullifies any claim to jurisdiction? Surely it does. This is the only guarantee that a court of admiralty, a star chamber proceeding, a kangaroo court, or an arbitrary proceeding by whatever name does not occur. That court proceedings must be within constitutional provisions has been forcefully established by the Supreme Court.” Muskrat v. United States.

Habeas Corpus (writ of – Constitution).

U.S. Constitution Art. 1., 4., 5., 6., 7., 9., 10., and in it's entirety.

And there are countless other relevant cites of Authorities, and others even more relevant than the others, of case, fact, and law which protects Aggrieved Defendants' arguments, standing, and rights, as well as the crimes committed by attorney Jennifer Coke, attorney Gregory D. Vescovo, and/or Judge Dan Dildine, however, I have not included them herein in order to save space and time, however, I can provide them to the court, in writing, if necessary.

SIGNUP TO GET THE FREE PASSWORD TO ACCESS THE "STEP BY STEP  POWER SYSTEMS" (FEATURING: VIDEO TUTORIALS, AUDIO TUTORIALS, EDITABLE TEMPLATES, DETAILED  "HOW TO" INSTRUCTIONS, TOP OF THE LINE LIVE SUPPORT, AND MORE)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *